Saharacares Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208938972
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Bountiful, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8015414425
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Autism
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $23,922
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA RIDGES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LISA RIDGES (PRESIDENT)
- TOM MABEY (DIRECTOR)
- SHAUNA C MABEY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide public interaction opportunities within the community through specialty functions designed to enhance the lives and childhood memories of children who are disadvantaged, seriously ill from a financially challenged family or at risk. This will enrich the hearts, minds, talents and bolster the sense of esteem and wellbeing of the children who are disadvantaged, seriously ill, from a financially challenged family or at risk, as well as the community, whether by direct or indirect participation. To provide opportunities and functions within the community to make available informational, teaching and educational materials or workshops to family, friends, leaders and teachers of children who are disadvantaged, seriously ill, from a financially challenged family or at risk. To partner with other nonprofit and governmental organizations in fundraising to further the purposes of the corporation and to create the opportunities and functions within the community to improve the lives an
What it reported doing in 2018
Autism carnival: during 2017, the organization hosted 600 autistic children, their siblings, and immediate family for a total of approximately 3,000 participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.