Sage Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931633233
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fort Yates, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7018549990
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,658,825
- Expenses
- $3,073,378
- Assets
- $7,068,281
- Liabilities
- $249,285
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- COURTNEY YELLOWFAT (CHAIRMAN): $1,200 total reported compensation
- KIMIMILA LOCKE (SECRETARY): $1,000 total reported compensation
- WILBERTA RED TOMAHAWK (TREASURER): $1,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sage foundation (sage), a 100% native-led organization, is dedicated to community development, institution-building, and self-determination for the standing rock sioux tribe. Sage foundation exists to ensure energy independence, protect the environment, and promote economic growth in the region, for the tribe.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 59.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.3; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 102.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 101.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 103.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.