Safe Worldwide Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813680190
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Monte Sereno, CA, USA
Phone
4083484506
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$368,420
Expenses
$357,199
Assets
$62,725
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Linda Lanzl (Chairperson of the Board)
  • Ruth Michiko Kahl (Secretary and Treasurer)
  • Donna Anne Dale (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Addressing root causes of endangered species decline and habitat loss through education, strategic partnerships and innovative community-driven solutions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Conservation Education Programs Description SAFE Worldwide's Conservation Education Programs inspire and educate children, students, educators, and communities about wildlife conservation while encouraging future careers in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), wildlife biology, ecology, veterinary medicine, and environmental stewardship. The program is founded on the belief that long-term conservation success depends upon educating and empowering future generations to become informed advocates and leaders for wildlife and the environment. Throughout the year, SAFE Worldwide provides educational presentations and outreach programs for public and private schools, community organizations, and youth groups, sharing firsthand experiences from wildlife conservation projects around the world. Educational programs introduce participants to endangered species, biodiversity, ecosystem conservation, wildlife trafficking, habitat protection, and innovative conservation solutions through engaging presentations, photographs, videos, and interactive discussions. The program also includes SAFE Worldwide's educational book series, which uses age-appropriate storytelling to teach children about endangered wildlife and the environmental challenges they face while inspiring compassion and conservation action. Copies of these books are distributed to students during school presentations and educational events, extending learning beyond the classroom. Additional STEM initiatives, including engineering and technology-based conservation projects, encourage students to apply scientific thinking and innovation to real-world conservation challenges while introducing them to career opportunities in wildlife conservation and environmental science. A cornerstone of the program is SAFE Worldwide's annual Wildlife Conservation Camp in the Mgahinga region of Uganda, where students living near the habitat of endangered mountain gorillas participate in immersive conservation education experiences. The camp introduces young people to the ecological importance of protected areas, the role of wildlife in healthy ecosystems, and the challenges facing endangered species, including habitat loss, poaching, and human-wildlife conflict. Through interactive activities, conservation lessons, games, and discussions led by conservation professionals, students develop a greater appreciation for their natural heritage while learning practical ways they can contribute to protecting wildlife within their own communities. The camp also encourages students to pursue future careers in conservation, wildlife biology, veterinary medicine, ecology, park management, environmental science, and other STEM-related fields. By fostering environmental stewardship at an early age, the program helps build the next generation of conservation leaders while strengthening community support for the long-term protection of mountain gorillas and other endangered wildlife.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Pass
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $353K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.