Safe Nesttemporary Assistance For
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942411883
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7028770133
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,977,077
- Expenses
- $7,994,902
- Assets
- $21,452,255
- Liabilities
- $5,538,346
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LIZ ORTENBURGER (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LIZ ORTENBURGER (CEO): $302,123 total reported compensation
- ROBERT DAWSON (COO): $132,220 total reported compensation
- ANGELA REYES (CPO): $127,576 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
What it reported doing in 2024
Counseling, advocacy, and education: safe nest is dedicated to ending abusive patterns within relationships and stopping the cycle of domestic violence within families. Counseling services offered by safe nest include individual and group therapy sessions for adult and youth victims conducted by licensed marriage and family therapists and licensed clinical social workers that specifically address domestic violence issues. Counseling is provided free of charge for victims of abuse and for children who have witnessed or suffered the effects of violence in the home. Understanding that ending domestic violence means changing how individuals who use violence manage their emotions and interact with their partners, safe nest also provides state-certified batterers' therapy groups for court-ordered and volunteer participants. The goal of the batterers' counseling program is to provide intervention and education to individuals who use violence so they can adopt non-violent strategies to deal with stress and anger. Safe nest's advocacy program provides advocates both on-site and in the field to assist survivors who are navigating the legal system in pursuit of safety and justice. Safe nest advocates at family court, the temporary protection order (tpo) office, the district attorney's office, and lvmpd area commands orient victims to court processes; develop safety plans; assist with obtaining protection orders; provide referrals; accompany victims to court; and partner with attorneys, law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, child protective services, and other entities as needed to provide support for survivors. Safe nest performs community engagement to counter harmful social norms that can encourage intimate partner violence. Interventions include providing education and professional training that challenge myths about domestic violence and striving to correct misconceptions to increase public awareness of domestic violence. Community outreach activities grounded in this premise work to promote services to victims and prevent future domestic violence. Education and outreach services provided by safe nest include age-appropriate dating violence prevention classes conducted in the clark county school district, conflict resolution training and mentoring programs for teens, information and resources for faith-based communities, culturally-specific outreach to under-served populations, and training for community partners and professionals who identify and refer victims.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 75% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.6%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.68; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.6% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $302K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.