Safe Haven of Person County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561758587
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Roxboro, NC, USA
Phone
7042210572
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$310,460
Expenses
$274,794
Assets
$62,379
Liabilities
$60,227

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNETTE HAMPTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNETTE HAMPTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $86,900 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Safe nbsp; haven nbsp; of nbsp; person nbsp; county nbsp; is nbsp; a nbsp; community-supported nbsp; human nbsp; service nbsp; organization nbsp; dedicated nbsp; to nbsp; assisting nbsp; victims/survivors nbsp; and nbsp; their nbsp; families nbsp; in nbsp; ending nbsp; dv nbsp; sa nbsp; and nbsp; discrimination nbsp; in nbsp; their nbsp; lives nbsp; through nbsp; education nbsp; systems nbsp; change nbsp; building nbsp; community nbsp; partnerships nbsp; and nbsp; ensuring nbsp; availability nbsp; and nbsp; accessibility nbsp; of nbsp; support nbsp; services

What it reported doing in 2024

Domestic violence services program name and purpose safe haven of person county provides comprehensive domestic violence services to individuals and families impacted by intimate partner violence. Services include crisis intervention emergency shelter and safe housing assistance safety planning court and legal advocacy crisisline services case management referrals counseling and support services and assistance with obtaining resources needed to establish safety and independence. Number of individuals served fy 07/01/2024 06/30/2025 522 documented survivors program successes during the fiscal year safe haven continued to provide critical confidential services to domestic violence survivors throughout person county and surrounding communities. Survivors received individualized safety planning advocacy emergency assistance court accompaniment referrals and ongoing support based on their individual circumstances and needs. Safe haven also maintained an active presence in the community through outreach and awareness activities at colleges schools community events and other public locations. Staff provided educational materials information about available services and opportunities for individuals to speak privately with advocates. These outreach efforts were especially important because individuals sometimes disclosed personal experiences with domestic violence or expressed concerns about a family member during these events. Outreach allowed safe haven to connect individuals with support in settings where they may not otherwise have sought assistance. General outreach contacts were not included in the number of documented survivors served unless the individual received direct victim services. This allows the agency to demonstrate the importance and reach of its community education efforts while maintaining accurate service statistics.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.6%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 45.3%; rating input score 45
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 76.9%; rating input score 77; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.6% of revenue deployed · 45.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 26 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.