Safari Club International Idaho Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820449914
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Phone
2087093094
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,844
Expenses
$82,538
Assets
$55,466

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TONY HAFLA (President)
  • JOHN KOLBET (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • TONY HAFLA (President)
  • JOHN KOLBET (Vice President)
  • ERIK BUTTS (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Protection of the rights of hunters to hunt the world over. Education of the nonhunting public of the role hunters play and efforts of hunters in the conservation and preservation of wildlife and wildlife habitat all over the world. Education of the nonhunting public by teaching the benefits from hunting fees that flow through to benefit wildlife and the necessity of wildlife being professionally managed in order to maintain healthy wildlife populations all across the world.the sensory safari is a collection of wild animal mounts that sci puts on display for the general public to enjoy free of charge. Participants are encouraged to touch the mounts for a hands on experience with the animals. This is especially important to blind participants in providing them the ability to get an idea of what a deer or rabbit etc feels like and what shape it has. We are also able to explain the value that hunting has as a management tool for wildlife managers.sci national requires all affiliated clubs

What it reported doing in 2018

Contributed funds to Idaho wild sheep foundation to help with the cost of supporting popoulations of Idaho big horn sheep.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 7
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 7.1%; rating input score 7
  • Program expense ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 7

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 7.1% of revenue deployed · 6.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.