Sadies Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263778947
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- San Angelo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3253741169
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,189
- Expenses
- $26,485
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Morgan Trainer (President)
People named in this filing
- Morgan Trainer (President)
- Stacy Lind (Director)
- Ryan Smith (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organization will partner with the community and other rescue organizations to reunite lost companion pets with owners. When that is not possible, we will provide refuge, health care, and training and rehabilitation to dogs in shelters, surrendered by owners or found abused, neglected or abandoned through the utilization of foster familes. Offer education about spaying/neutering in order to reduce over population and organizing and partipating in spat/neuter programs when possible. We will provide pet owner education when possible.
What it reported doing in 2013
Pet Adoption Services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.6%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 14.5%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -46.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -34.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -30.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.6% of revenue deployed · 14.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.