Sadaqa for All Foundation Okc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810738751
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4059827686
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,934
- Expenses
- $77,924
- Assets
- $87,250
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAIMA RIZVI (PRESIDENT)
- TAYYABA FAZZAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HOORIA SUHAIB (DIRECTOR)
- SAIMA RIZVI (PRESIDENT)
- TAYYABA FAZZAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide help to less fortunate individuals in the community by program and fundraising activities. We also did online fundraising, a gift card drive, monthly diaper distgribution, utility and tuition assistance program to assist individuals, and women empowerment programs.
What it reported doing in 2023
Provide help to less fortunate individuals in the community by program and fundraising activities. Program expenses are help with rentals 4,486, utilities 42,353, gas 68, street bags 5,220, meals 407, charitable contributions 201, commisions and fees 129, general assistance 765, phone 156, diapers 500, for a total of 54,285.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.6%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.6% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.