Sacred Heart Cathedral Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451584666
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Davenport, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5633243257
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $333,352
- Expenses
- $560,007
- Assets
- $8,614,672
- Liabilities
- $700
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN HARRIS (DIRECTOR)
- ELIZABETH SLESICKI (DIRECTOR)
- MATTHEW THOMPSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate exclusively for religious, charitable, and educational purposes, as a nonprofit corporation within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, or corresponding provisions of any subsequent federal tax law, with all of its activities so conducted. The operation of the corporation shall be conducted in compliance with the objectives and philosophy of the diocese of davenport, Iowa, and the code of canon law; and to promote the strength and growth of sacred heart cathedral, davenport, Iowa.
What it reported doing in 2024
Funds are utilized for the maintenance of the building which provides education and religious purpose space for the community and parishioners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 34.1%; rating input score 34
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -68%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.38; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 34.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $191K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.