Sacramento Red Mens Hall Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 940574795
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Carmichael, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9167162606
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fraternal Societies
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,111
- Expenses
- $6,171
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARVIN ASHTON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARVIN ASHTON (PRESIDENT)
- BERNARD MINICHOWICZ (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
- JOHN ELLIS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A purpose of this organization is buy, hold, improve, sell and other dealings in real estate. In particular, the organization purchased a building located at 5501 sky parkway in sacramento, ca in may 2008. The purpose of this building was to provide a community meeting place for state and local red men chapter organizations and other exempt organizations including churches and other other charitable organizations. This building was sold in 2017.
What it reported doing in 2018
The red mens hall association is the oldest fraternal organization in the united states which was organized for the the benefit of all americans. The roots of the association can be traced back to the american revolution and the boston tea party. Activities of the organization embrace the betterment and enrichment of the overall american community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 91.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.