Sacramento Environmental Justice Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920582491
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9169001717
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,434
- Expenses
- $90,431
- Assets
- $154,290
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VENZUALIA HOLIFIELD (BOARD PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VENZUALIA HOLIFIELD (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MARY CERVANTEZ (BOARD TREASURER)
- ELENA RAUDALES (BOARD SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sacramento environmental justice coalition was formed to address health and environmental inequities among poor and marginalized communities of the greater sacramento region. Through community organizing efforts, the organization seeks partnerships with faith-based communities, nonprofits, civic groups, and individuals committed to addressing inequities and environmental justice issues.
What it reported doing in 2024
Leadership development - through adult learning techniques, we identify, train and develop grassroots leaders interested in becoming public leaders on issues that affect them the most. We value a person's story and through experience and evaluation, leaders develop critical skills for public life. We have also developed leaders who have learned to fight unfair housing evictions for over one hundred residents. They have learned to create and implement an agenda and understand the importance of civic engagement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.