Sachas Supper Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931864797
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6196755999
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Music

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,500
Expenses
$3,905
Assets
$8,595

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sacha Boutros (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sacha Boutros (President)
  • Irma Stroot (Treasurer)
  • Sharon Evans (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create a touring concert series of one of our historical main events SWING WITH BING around the United states. This events mimics a USO event from WW2 and promotes American Culture, music, period dresss and swing dancing.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Sacha's Supper Club is to create a touring concert series of one of our historical main events SWING WITH BING around the United Staes. This events mimics a USO event from WW2 and promotes American culture, music, period dress and swing dancing. To Create a concert and artistic music series at The Conrad in San Diego.To create concert series and curations of musical community events that are EIB+ and bring people together. To host Jazz and music ensembles middle school through university and further performance study for youth jazz ensembles both by sponsorship and aslo hosting performance spaces. Mentoring youth who are studying musc and seeking careers in the entertainment, sercie and business fields.Donating programming for elder homes and retirement communities and raising funds for orphanages in Mexico.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.