Rye Youth Soccer Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133059535
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
RYE, NY, USA
Phone
7169838259
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,215,061
Expenses
$1,136,948
Assets
$385,841
Liabilities
$232

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM MILLER (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JARED SMALL (EXECUTIVE DI): $140,792 total reported compensation
  • SALVATORE CURELLA (CFO): $25,243 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The program was formed to foster, promote, encourage and support the playing of soccer in the city of rye, New York.

What it reported doing in 2024

Travel team soccer is open to boys and girls who live in the city of rye or rye brook and/or attend public or private school in rye. The travel teams require a committment of 2 ten week seasons (fall and spring), no games columbus day, memorial day, or easter weekend, game each sunday, mandatory team practice on saturday and a mid-week pracitce with a professional coach. The format of the travel team is; up and u10 teams play a 7v7 format on a smaller field, u11 teams play a 9v9 format, u12 and older temas play 11v11 format on a regulation size field. Travel team soccer is competitive team soccer comprised of teams from communities in westchester, the bronx and manhattan. We are under the immediate jurisdiction of the westchester your soccer leagaue and must follow their rules and guidelines. While the program is more competitive than our saturday intramural program, the up and u10 age groups are considered developmental. The primary focus of the program is to teach the game of soccer grounding players in the skills, tactics and strategies of the game while fostering a love for the sport. We strive to teach children the sense of accomplishmnet that can be achieved through working together. Towards this end, we require a commitment from each child to work hard, come to scheduled practices and games, to support each other and to win or lose as a team. As there are often more potential players than there are team positions available, we ask that players who choose to participate on rye youth soccer travel teams make it their primary sport during soccer season. Empasizing teamwork and commitment serves a greater purpose than to teach abstract values. It is the most efficient weay to develop competitive teams. This is because soccer is a team sport and because games are won by teams, not by collections of individuals. Just as importantly, it teaches that success can be acheived by hard work. It is not unusual that a college all-american started as a substitute player on a community team. Finally, the philosophy of emphasizing sportsmanship helps to teach children how to handle themselves in the most competitive of situations. Towards this end, we expect and insist that parents and other fans set good expamples of sportsmanship through positive reinforcement of players, coaches, and referees. Parental sideling conduct is strictly monitored by rye youth soccer board members. The philosophy of the program ensures that every child who demonstrates a commitment to the team will play in every game. The amount of playing time will vary depending on the childs progress and the game situation. Depending on the size of the team, each child can expect to play a third of each game. Boys and girls are formed into teams based on gender and age. Ages are defined as being younger than an age by a specific date. This is a new rule enacted by us soccer. We encourage children who are not selected to a travel team to play in our extended intramural program to continue building skills until such time as an opening occurs on a travel team. We are limited by our league to forming 4 teams per year in the u9 and u10 categories consisting of a maximum if 14 players each. We field an "a" team in each age group each year with exception of u9 teams which field 2 b+ and 2 b teams. All teams within an age group practice together as a unit. U9 teams will remain intact for the first 2 seasons. Thereafter, we encourage upward movement over downward movement. Players who move down will do so only after the spring season. Due to the developmental focus of the u9 and u10 program, it is imperative that players be selected to play at the appropriate level to maximize playing time, buidl skills and maximize enjoyment. Those wishing to play travel team are selected based on the following three principles; input from rye youth soccer intramural coaches rating each player based on their impressions over the course of the imtramural season, tryout rating players individually

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 63
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.3% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $141K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.