RVA Hospice LLC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882922814
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Richmond, VA, USA
Phone
8045781048
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,749,563
Expenses
$2,113,237
Assets
$181,460
Liabilities
$296,805

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jo Anne Seidner (Past CEO)
  • Cheryl Hamilton Fried (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Cheryl Hamilton Fried (CEO): $89,403 total reported compensation
  • Jo Anne Seidner (Past CEO): $17,526 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kirva Hospice is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing excellence in care to our patients, families, and care givers in the greater Richmond area. Kirva Hospice is built on the philosophy of care that is deeply rooted in the Jewish traditions and values that include caring for the sick and elderly, the centrality of family and welcoming the stranger as we extend care and concern to those we serve. We are devoted to ensuring that every patient is treated with dignity, kindness, and respect regardless of religion, gender, race, age, nationality, ability or sexual orientation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Providing excellence in care to our patients, families, and care givers in the greater Richmond area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 74% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.3%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 57.6%; rating input score 58
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.64; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 52.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 62.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.3% of revenue deployed · 57.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.