Rustling Pines Civic Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741497744
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7134682410
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neighborhood, Block Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,284
- Expenses
- $58,348
- Assets
- $103,400
- Liabilities
- $4,021
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kolby Kettler (President)
- Tracy Terrell (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kolby Kettler (President)
- Tracy Terrell (Vice President)
- Sean Sullivan (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a subdivision Home Owner's Association. Our primary Operational objectives are to manage and pay for weekly trash removal services and manage/pay for additional security patrols (as budget allows) thru our local Constable. In addition, the HOA maintains an Entrance signage area that requires landscaping, lighting, and sprinkler/water service. Finally, we also have a website to facilitate communications to residents on information pertinent to our home owners.
What it reported doing in 2013
Maintained landscaping at Front Entrance to subdivision via monthly contract and payment to landscaper.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.2% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.