Rushmore Consumer Credit Resource Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237364664
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Rapid City, SD, USA
- Phone
- 6053484550
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Financial Counseling
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $403,672
- Expenses
- $387,464
- Assets
- $1,497,238
- Liabilities
- $63,766
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS MAREINA (EXECUTIVE DI): $64,055 total reported compensation
- BONNIE SPAIN (ASSISTANT DI): $61,848 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide underserved individuals and families with training, counseling, and financial literacy. Creating a brighter financial future for all people.
What it reported doing in 2025
The american center for credit education develops and publishes financial education programs including credit when credit is due, make your move: a guide to homeownership, money in motion, start right: build your own business, rebuilding your credit, and the ten steps to buying a car. We also distribute these programs nationwide to non-profit credit counseling agencies, housing counseling agencies, and community action agencies. We have distributed 1,941,706 financial literacy programs. Locally, we are deeply committed to promoting financial literacy to the underserved populations within our communities. Our approach prioritizes breaking barriers to access and meeting individuals where they are with targeted partnerships and programs: we reach individuals and families often overlooked by mainstream services. We collaborate with oneheart, cornerstone womens apartments, the va, and volunteers of america, to ensure people experiencing homelessness receive the counseling and education they need. Recognizing the diversity of challenges faced by individuals, we address the needs of those struggling with addiction partnering with lss, and northern hills drug court. Similarly, we support at- risk youth through job corps and family connections, and single parents through catholic social services uplifting parents program. Inclusion for marginalized groups: our work extends to incarcerated individuals through partnerships with pennington county jail, the rapid city work center, the pennington county juvenile service center, and the womens prison, helping them reintegrate into society with better tools and resources. We work with ellsworth air force base and the department of labors tanf program to serve working families, military personnel, and those facing economic hardship. Building intentional partnerships and tailoring our services to meet the unique needs of these populations, we strive to foster a sense of belonging, empowerment, and opportunity for all. In 2025, locally we reached 961 individuals with classes and 574 with online programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.6%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.86; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.6% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $325K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $64K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.