Rush Henrietta Lacrosse Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473181109
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Henrietta, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5857030260
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,447
- Expenses
- $64,661
- Assets
- $22,923
- Liabilities
- $207
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEAGHAN BEDEN (CO-PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIE DEWALD (CO-PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH MILLER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MEAGHAN BEDEN (CO-PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIE DEWALD (CO-PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH MILLER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a youth lacrosse club formed exclusively for the chartiable and educational purposes within the definition of 501(c)(3). The mission of the organization is to provide the youth of the towns and rush and henrietta the opportunity to participate in competitive lacrosse events and develop athletic skills while teaching youth teamwork, disipline, and sportsmanship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided the youth of rush and henrietta the opportunity to advance their athletic skills and sportsmanship in the sport of lacrosse through the participation of league and tournament play.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.