Ruff Road Revival
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331937732
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Krum, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9724822595
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,676
- Expenses
- $103,913
- Assets
- $3,674
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mikayla Stone (President)
People named in this filing
- Amanda Gonsalves (Director)
- Jonathan Sambataro (Director)
- Jennifer Douglas (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This organization's primary exempt purpose is to save animals that have found themselves either on the streets or in high euthanasia shelters, place them into foster homes, ensure they receive the care, supplies and medical care that they need, and find them wonderful adoptive homes.
What it reported doing in 2025
Medical and direct care expenses- The focus of this accomplishment is immediate health and physical needs for the animals we rescued. In 2025, we helped 352 animals receive the care they needed. All of them had to get medical care of some sort, including vaccines, microchips, and spay/neuter. Many of them needed heartworm treatment, surgeries, or hospitalization due to illness such as parvo. This was by far the largest cost for the rescue. Another aspect of care we provide is necessary supplies for the animals. As a foster-based animal rescue, we ensure each of our fosters has the supplies necessary to adequately care for their foster animal(s). The final aspect of direct care is boarding costs. While we aim to have all of our animals in foster homes, it is inevitable that we occasionally end up needing to put one into boarding.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.