Ruff Past Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863703267
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kingston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6176881642
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $306
- Assets
- $4,843
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Lisek (President)
- Juliette Lisek (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mark Lisek (President)
- Mark Lisek (Director)
- Evan Coletta (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Adoption and relocation of dogs from high-kill shelters by bringing them to non-kill shelters, dog sanctuaries or homes, relocation from non-kill shelters to homes or areas canm also be provided to provide the public with access to rescue dogs in areas that have a demand or shortage of rescue dogs available. Said organization is organized exclusively for tthe public by raising awareness about the euthanization rates in shelters throughout the country, and how the public can help reduce the death rates through rescue animal adoptions rather than purchasing animals from breeders.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our company website has made some progress, once we have the website complete, we hope to then be able to show dogs available at kill-shelters for shelters to request Ruff Past Rescue to relocate the kill-shelter dog to a non-kill shelter dog. The general public will have the same access to have the dog brought to their home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.83; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 66.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $306 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.