Rudy Romano Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455328798
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4157639275
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,000
Expenses
$179
Assets
$1,834
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cleofe Villanueva (President)

People named in this filing

  • Cleofe Villanueva (President)
  • Francisco Alagbate (Secretary)
  • VonRoyce Villanueva (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To continue the work of Fr. Rudy Romano, a Redemptorist Missionary Priest kidnapped in the Philippines because of his defense of human rights, the oppressed and the disadvantaged, led to his abduction during the martial law of the Philippines. The foundation is dedicated to helping the underprivileged children in Villareal, Samar hometown of Fr. Rudy. To this end, we offer an after-school-program in form of movie showing on Friday and Saturday nights to keep the children away from drugs and gambling activities that besiege the town; sports activities like basketball; games/activities for small children; and teach-in class in manners, conduct, and healthy habits.

What it reported doing in 2022

The foundation's international activities were inactive due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.25; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.