RSL Enrichment Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472033800
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Great Neck, NY, USA
Phone
7189932280
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,750
Expenses
$121,412
Assets
$570
Liabilities
$8,523

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marjan Rokhsar (President)

People named in this filing

  • Marjan Rokhsar (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

RSL Enrichment will work with neighborhood children, empowering their parents to advvocate for their families, be positive role models, and become successful citizens. The underserved children and families in need of enrichment programs not provided by existing organizations no matter what type they may be. While RSLI's focus begins with low income families the aim is to support them as they move to financial stability. Our programs target health and nutrition, parent involvement, social services, disability services, safety and family literacy. RSLEI is committed to the development and enhancement of every child we serve and their families with a focus on parents/guardians.RSLEI's goal is to meet each child on his or her level and provide developmentally appropriate enrichment experiences supporting existing schools, community centers, housing authorities that primarily serve the underserved. RSLEI seeks to provide our programs in a comfortable, safe and enriched environment.

What it reported doing in 2019

The organization offered enrichment programs to low-income families with children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 14.95; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 42.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -50.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 62.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.