Rrs-oasis Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811857191
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Beverly, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9789225107
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Preservation, Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,315
- Expenses
- $59,479
- Assets
- $24,992
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOAN M GALLAGHER (PRESIDENT &)
People named in this filing
- JOAN M GALLAGHER (PRESIDENT &)
- MICHAEL RALBOVSKY (VICE PRESIDE)
- DYAN KARSTENS (CLERK)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide: reptile, bird, and other animal rescue and rehabilitation; emergency shelter and care for reptiles, birds, and other animals that have been abandoned, confiscated, or that are otherwise in need of care, support, or treatment; education and training regarding the proper care of, humane capture and/ or confiscation of reptiles, birds, and other animals; and, any other charitable or benevolent act in furtherance of the welfare of reptiles, birds, and other animals.
What it reported doing in 2020
Rescue and maintain exoctic animals
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.