Rr Ranch

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932075654
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Phone
4803403655
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal-Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,015
Expenses
$121,876
Assets
$183,866

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA WALKER (CEO)
  • JACQUE FLINDALL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAMANTHA WALKER (CEO)
  • MICHAEL WALKER (CFO)
  • MARTA GONZALEZ (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rr ranch believes that horses possess an extraordinary ability to awaken our souls and bring people together. Our goal is to utilize horses incredible power to create a transformative educational experience for all who enter our equine haven. Rr ranch is where horses and people rediscover their authentic selves and develop substantial relationships.

What it reported doing in 2025

Rr ranch provided equine assisted learning sessions along with ranch and garden courses to over 50 different participants in the foster care system in maricopa county as well as children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (asd) at no cost to the participants or facilities that care for the participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 68.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 53.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.