Royal Palm Gardens
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611495753
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Corpus Christi, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3618893350
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $967,352
- Liabilities
- $8,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GARY ALLSUP (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- MARISA SMITHWICH (VICE PRESIDENT FOR TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING)
- BUITRON LORENZO (VICE PRESIDENT OF FACILITIES OPERATIONS)
Highest reported compensation
- GARY ALLSUP (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $630,423 total reported compensation
- MARISA SMITHWICH (VICE PRESIDENT FOR TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING): $269,990 total reported compensation
- RHEN BASS (CFO): $218,231 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Refinancing, or providing public facilities
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of royal palm gardens is to provide housing and to expand related services provided for low and moderate-income families, elderly and disabled individuals and as needed to further the goals of its sponsor organization, the corpus christi housing authority.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $630K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.