Royal Family Kids Lenexa C/o Kristi Streit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822307137
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Lenexa, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9139482623
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,574
- Expenses
- $67,484
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELSEY ERSKINE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KRISTI STREIT (TREASURER)
- KELSEY ERSKINE (PRESIDENT)
- SHERYL JORDAN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of royal family kids lenexa is to create positive memories in the lives of abused, neglected or abandoned children.
What it reported doing in 2022
Camp - due to the impact of covid-19 since 2020, we were unable to provide a traditional summer camp. Instead we held an alternative family day camp. This included all the necessities and activities that our campers usually enjoyed at our residential camp. We provided a meal, snacks, hygiene items, t-shirts, crafts, etc for all foster and/or adoptive families in attendance. Each family also received grocery gift cards. We also held a carnival and birthday party for all attendees. All of our remaining camp supplies and gear from past years were gifted to the families in attendance. All remaining items were donated to other royal family kids camps in topeka and manhattan, Kansas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -483.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -58.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -53.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.