Roy Eddleman Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274957776
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2159252222
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,695
- Expenses
- $1,695
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- KEVIN CAVANAUGH (TREASURER)
- DAVID COLE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The roy eddleman institute was formed for the benefit of the chemical heritage foundation, a public charity described in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(2) of the internal revenue code. The chemical heritage foundation is now known as the science history institute (shi). The roy eddleman institute continues to carry out the purposes of the shi, principally through programs and fellowships in the areas of collecting, preserving, interpreting and disseminating materials that record and explain the various achievements in the chemical sciences. A particular focus of support will be shi's own roy eddleman institute, and its development of electronic, digital, printed, web, and modern media presentations that render vivid the adventure and progress of the chemical and biomolecular sciences, in ways that provide informal learning opportunities to varied publics - e.g. K through 12, college, post-graduate, and general audiences.
What it reported doing in 2024
The roy eddleman institute, the outreach arm of science history institute (shi), brings chemistry to a broad audience through public programs, print and web-based publications, and educational materials. The institute also operates the museum at (shi), which explores subjects ranging from alchemy to nanotechnology.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -82.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.