Roxbury High School Baseball Parents Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 223392533
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024
Location: Succasunna, NJ, USA
Phone: 8624322441
Rating: 82
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $49,785
Expenses: $34,213
Assets: $35,424
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

CYNDI RIZZO (PRESIDENT)
JENNIFER DONNELLY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

CYNDI RIZZO (PRESIDENT)
JENNIFER DONNELLY (VICE PRESIDENT)
JES BECKER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support roxbury high school baseball program

What it reported doing in 2024

The club supplements baseball equipment & supplies which the high school cannot afford. In addition the club provides funds & labor for maintenance of the ballfield beyond which the board of education has budgeted. Assistance is provided by the club for the teams when they travel away from home. Between 60-65 ballplayers at the freshmen, junior varsity, and varsity levels receive these benefits.

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 81
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 67
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 68.7%; rating input score 69
Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 31.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 68.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.