Rowen Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853049933
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lawrenceville, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4048210638
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,707
- Expenses
- $3,828,687
- Assets
- $100,017,980
- Liabilities
- $112,302,983
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MASON AILSTOCK (CEO,EX-OFFICIO DIRECTOR, N)
People named in this filing
- SACHIN D SHAILENDRA (DIRECTOR, CHAIR)
- DR DEBORAH BRUNER (DIRECTOR)
- SAMUEL H HINTON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To be a catalyst for education, research, innovation and transformation through the creation of a global destination which recognizes stewardship of the land as the cornerstone of an inspired community.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o gwinnett county, Georgia (the "county or "gwinnett county') has an opportunity to develop 1800 acres in the county, located centrally between three major economic centers in the state of Georgia (atlanta, athens, and gainesville) and equidistant from three major research universities (the university of Georgia, Georgia institute of technology, and emory university). The county's vision is to develop the land into a district for agricultural, medical, environmental, and high technology research as well as research-related manufacturing and support services (the "district'). The corporation will promote social welfare, including, but not limited to: (i) economic development by attracting education, training, research, job creation, innovation, and transformation to the corporation's property and the surrounding area; (ii) advancing public health for the community at large; (iii) providing a place where the land, its collective history, and the development of it and the corporation's other assets are managed consistently and respectfully for the benefit of the community; and (iv) reducing the burdens of government. The corporation's economic development activities are two-fold: real-estate programming will attract business to the district and to surrounding areas; innovation programming defines the ways in which the corporation will create value for the county, the state of Georgia, and private and institutional partners, distinguishing itself in a global innovation economy. Analysis of business and academic resources in Georgia, as well as international pressures for innovation, reveal three inter-related areas of focus for the district's tenants and property owners: medical research, technology, and approaches to preventative care; agricultural research, technology, and environmental sensitivity; and environmental research and technology that can reduce the imprint of all sectors on the environment. It is the interrelatedness of the district's three areas of focus that will be the primary drivers of economic development. The district's design, amenities, and character will appeal to many public and private institutions, but the district's competitive advantage and its ability to add value to gwinnett county and Georgia lie in the unique collaboration that can take place there. The three areas of focus for the district- medical, agricultural, and environmental - are all directly correlated with advancing public health. Each of these areas of public health cannot advance without consideration of all of them. For instance, digital monitoring of chemicals used in agriculture can reduce the impact of chemicals on the environment and improve the health of community members. More efficient production of food can decrease the amount of land needed for agriculture. The growth in wholistic approaches to health rely on healthy eating and clean air and water. Not only will research and other activities taking place in the district focus on health and the environment, among other disciplines, but the district itself will promote healthy lifestyles by developing parks, walk/run/bike paths and spaces for social, business, and educational gatherings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5,472.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.12; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.12; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 41.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $24.6M reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.