Crosby Scholars Rowan
Legal name: Rowan County Crosby Scholars Community Partnership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462621465
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Salisbury, NC, US
- Phone
- 704-762-3512
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,588,843
- Expenses
- $1,016,673
- Assets
- $4,290,314
- Liabilities
- $109,853
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA VESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BARBARA MAIDA-STOLLE (DIRECTOR, EX-OFFICIO): $465,111 total reported compensation
- CURTIS BLAND (DIRECTOR, TREASURER): $316,781 total reported compensation
- JESSICA VESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $105,861 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crosby Scholars Rowan County is a free college and career readiness program for public school students in grades 6–12. We help students plan, prepare, and confidently take their next step after high school.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rowan County Crosby Scholars is a college access program through which public school students begin to prepare academically, financially, and personally for successful college admission as early as middle school. We are partnered with Goodwill Industries of Northwest North Carolina Inc. and modeled after the successful Crosby Scholars Community Partnership in Forsyth County, which graduates 100% of its seniors and sends 98% of its graduates on to access post-secondary education. Every public middle and high school student in Rowan County is eligible to join our program before 12th grade. Each year, students are encouraged to maintain at least a 2.0 GPA, attend a Crosby Academy workshop, complete and submit community service hours, follow school policies (i.e., no out-of-school suspensions), and commit to remaining drug/tobacco/alcohol free. High school students must also attend a college fair or visit four college campuses before graduation, and seniors must meet with 1:1 advisors throughout 12th grade to prepare for their next steps toward post-secondary plans. Students have the option of participating in additional college preparation meetings, which are led by staff or partner agencies. Students who complete all of the requirements each year automatically stay in the program as they progress through high school graduation. Enrollment in 2024 totaled 1,961 students in grades 6th-12th. Of those, 1,306 students received credit for attending one or more of our academy workshops. Community service hours were submitted by 1,198 of our students, who combined recorded over 5,379 hours of volunteer work. Our program provides college access training to parents, guardians, and volunteers so that each senior has a 1:1 advisor to meet with throughout the school year for assistance with the college process. In addition to the individual meetings, senior academy workshops were held to help with essay writing, college applications, standardized test taking, understanding financial aid, and general preparation for the freshman year of college. To date, the Rowan County Crosby Scholars program has graduated over 1,595 seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 68.8%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.22; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 68.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $699K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $465K · 24 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.