Routine Health Information Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352296980
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6174820617
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $6,904
- Assets
- $9,157
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEAN PIERRE DE LAMALLE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER/DIRECT)
People named in this filing
- THEO LIPPEVELD (DIRECTOR)
- AIMEE SILVA (CLERK)
- JEAN PIERRE DE LAMALLE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER/DIRECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Routine health information systems
What it reported doing in 2018
RHINO Event: In Q1, RHINO organized and hosted a side session at the 2018 Global Symposium on Health Systems Research (HSR) in Liverpool, United Kingdom on October 10th. The complementary discussion, Achieving Universal Health Coverage: The Role of Routine Health Information Systems, explored current approaches employed in low to middle income countries to strengthen RHIS, with a greater intention of improving the quality and equity of national health service delivery. Theo Lippeveld (JSI), Tariq Azim (MEASURE Evaluation), Vikas Dwivedi (JSI), and Jean-Pierre de Lamalle (AEDES/RHINO President) presented on topics that included: 1 Creating accountability in the community 2) Building an information culture leading to better data use, using human-centered design 3) (HCD) as an approach 4) Providing innovative electronic tools for data management and use at the facility level 5) The role of eHealth architectures and interoperability in HIS
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -59.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -54% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.