Rotary International Westbank Gretna Rotary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521205811
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Gretna, LA, USA
- Phone
- 5042887747
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,922
- Expenses
- $47,832
- Assets
- $15,322
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Annette McDow (President)
- James Blazek Jr (Vice President)
- Brad Fleming (President Elect)
People named in this filing
- Annette McDow (President)
- Blake Lawson (Treasurer)
- James Blazek Jr (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The object of the Rotary Club of the Westbank is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise and in particular to encourage and foster: First: The development fo acquaintance as an opportunity for service.Second: High ethical standards in business and professions; the recognition of the worthiness of all use full occupations and the dignifying by each Rotarian of his occupations as an opportunity to serve society.Third: The advancement of international understanding, goodwill and peace through a world fellowship of business and professional people untied in the ideal of service.
What it reported doing in 2023
Dues paid to Rotary International
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.9%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.9% of revenue deployed · 21.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.