Rotary International of Zanesville
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 316050689
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Zanesville, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7404539600
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,273
- Expenses
- $79,638
- Assets
- $45,754
- Liabilities
- $37,789
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHALA AITKEN (PRESIDENT)
- MATTHEW SCHREIBER (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- JULIE PAXTON (TREASURER/RO)
- SHALA ZEMBA (SECRETARY)
- KELLY ASHBY (PAST PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To encourage and promote the well being of the community through contributions to the needy, charities, and students continuing their education.
What it reported doing in 2024
We have and support several projects for our community such as: christmas gifts to disabled children, good neighbor day, healthy bodies program, and our community's veterans day parade.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.6%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 59.3%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.6% of revenue deployed · 59.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.