Rotary International of Hanover Pa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
236298146
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hanover, PA, USA
Phone
7176375915
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,657
Expenses
$27,541
Assets
$57,196
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE PLUMLEE (PRESIDENT)
  • JESSICA WALTERSDORFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK RIGGS (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE PLUMLEE (PRESIDENT)
  • JESSICA WALTERSDORFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARYBETH HOCKENBERRY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of rotary international of hanover, pa is to provide service to others; promote high ethical standards; advance world understanding through exchange programs and international projects; and to promote goodwill and peace through its fellowship of businesses, professionals and community leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

The rotary international of hanover, pa club provides various contributions to other local and international not-for-profit organizations to assist them in providing various community services. Funds from various club events are used to support programs through the hanover rotary club of Pennsylvania charitable fund, inc. ($893), through international projects, and through other various reoccuring and nonreoccuring ($3,838) projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.5%; rating input score 27
  • Program expense ratio: 28.1%; rating input score 28

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.5% of revenue deployed · 28.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.