Rotary International Iowa City

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
426127953
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Iowa City, IA, USA
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,085
Expenses
$72,154
Assets
$101,812

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Devin Van Holsteijn (President)
  • Tara Minetos (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Devin Van Holsteijn (President)
  • Tara Minetos (Past President)
  • Aaron Schaefer (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The exempt purpose of the Rotary Club of Iowa City - Noon is to provide service to others promote integrity and advance world understanding goodwill and peace through our fellowship of business professional and community leaders. These are the tenets of Rotary International of which this club is a part.

What it reported doing in 2024

RYLA World Affairs: Rotary Youth Leadership Academy RYLA is a leadership development program for young people who want to learn new skills build their confidence and have fun. Events range from one-day seminars to weeklong camps. In Iowa it is an annual event at a regional college where Clubs send youth from local high schools to engage in leadership training for one week. Students present to the Club at a regular meeting after their experience. For 2023-2024 fiscal year 12 students were supported by Iowa City Noon Rotary at Grinnell College RYLA. 20 students were sent to the World Affairs seminar in Waukesha WI.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.6%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 7

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.6% of revenue deployed · 6.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.