Rotary International Greenfield OH Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311147449
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Greenfield, OH, USA
Phone
9379814242
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,248
Expenses
$39,118
Assets
$203,627

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANA DAUGHTERY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANA DAUGHTERY (PRESIDENT)
  • BEVERLY GRIFFIN (SECRETARY)
  • MIKE PENN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide community support to the disadvantaged. We donate funds to help support area needy children and adults to support the local fire and life squad departments and to help support local education in the form of scholarships and financial support for educational programs. We also help to support the local little league sports programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the year we provided outdoor funiture for the hayes court, which is a community social area in downtown greenfield. We provided christmas meals for the needy, sponsored middle school children to go to Washington dc, donated funds to help replace auditorium seating in the local school building, funded a scholarship for high school student, and school supplies for the kindergarten class. We also helped to sponsor an all night party for junior/seniors, fishing event for underprivileged children, music festival, and other outings for local individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.5%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 45.3%; rating input score 45

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.21; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.5% of revenue deployed · 45.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.