ROTARY INTERNATIONAL Collierville Rotary Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
646035573
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Collierville, TN, USA
Phone
9012709364
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,375
Expenses
$79,670
Assets
$17,811
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Greg Cotton (President)
  • Terry Dean (Foundation President)
  • Kevin Baltier (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Greg Cotton (President)
  • Susan Ewing (Secretary, Social Media)
  • Kirk Northcutt (Executive Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A community organization dedicated to provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance community understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional and community leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

1- Raised over $130,000 ringing the Red Kettle bell over the Christmas Holiday for the local Salvation Army. 2- individual members collectively contributed $37,000 to The Rotary International Foundation. 3- Gave Thanksgiving grocery gift cards to 28 families. 4- Purchased holiday gifts for 24 families with school aged children. 5- Club members contributed over $6,000 to The Wreaths Across America and helped place Christmas wreaths on 8,000 military veteran gravesites.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 47% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.