Rotary International Circleville Sunrise Rotary Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311273732
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Kingston, OH, USA
Phone
6144033055
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,941
Expenses
$50,126
Assets
$72,674
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAN SHANNON (PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLY HARSHA (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • WESLEY EBENHACK (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JUDY CLIFTON (DIRECTOR)
  • ANTHONY NEFF (DIRECTOR)
  • KRISTA BOWER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise and, in particular, to encourage and foster first: the development of acquaintance as an opportunity for service; second: high ethical standards in business and professions, the recognition of the worthiness of all useful occupations, and the dignifying by each rotarian's occupation as an opportunity to serve society; third: the application of the ideal of service in each rotarian's personal, business, and community life; fourth: the advancement of international understanding, goodwill and peace through a world fellowship of business and professional persons united in the ideal of service.

What it reported doing in 2024

Development of acquantance as an opportunity for service. The club members who, as a business community, give back by not only participating in the club's programs but also by providing leadership to the community at large.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.