Rotary District 7040 Youth Exchange Program Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208364901
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Long Sault, Ontario, CA
Phone
6135345257
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,800
Expenses
$2,700
Assets
$1,400
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Sherri Agnew (Chairperson)
  • Joe Fontes (Vice Chair)
  • Dave Pelletier (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Public charity- The District 7040 Rotary Youth Exchange Program coordinates the exchange of club sponsored students who wish to live abroad for 3 - 6 weeks in the case of the Short Term Exchange Program, and those who wish to live and study abroad for up to 12 months in the case of the Long Term Exchange Program. Training and orientations sessions and delivered to both the inbound and outbound exchange students and there are a host of fun activities planned for inbound exchange students to expose them to the cultural activities and geographic differences in our district. I The program is governed by Rotary International which is a global service club.

What it reported doing in 2013

2 students from New York State participated in the Rotary Youth Exchange year long program by living abroad for one academic year of high school and two students participated in the Returning students program for one year in order to assist with their reintegration to the United States.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.