Rotary Club of Woodside and Portola Valley

Legal name: Rotary Club of Woodside-portola Valley Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943300512
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Belmont, CA, USA
Phone
6502228947
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,229
Expenses
$110,143
Assets
$119,235
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEN HAYES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KEN HAYES (PRESIDENT)
  • ALLEN CARY (TREASURER)
  • SANDRA PUGH (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improving access to education and protecting the natural environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

-looma education system for various schools in nepal ... Total $10,000-university scholarships for various students in nicaragua ... Total $10,000-general support to jore academy ... Total $6,800-nairasirasa prim sch library through oliveseed foundation ... Total $5,000-int'l proj: grants less than $5,000 each, including learning missions through rebuilding allicance, a fire truck purchase for mexico, birth assistant grants in nepal, and more ... Total $8,200-community svc proj: grants less than $5,000 each, including awarding camp scholarships, awarding senior scholarships, providing dictionaries, gifting thanksgiving baskets and more ... Total $21,918

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -59.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 72.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 11 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.