Rotary Club of Wasco

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770497200
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Wasco, CA, USA
Phone
6617851191
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,924
Expenses
$40,982
Assets
$34,715

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joshua Huddleston (Past President)
  • Jeffrey Martin (President Elect)
  • Rosalinda Chairez (President)

People named in this filing

  • Joshua Huddleston (Past President)
  • Danny Arellano (Treasurer)
  • Jeffrey Martin (President Elect)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rotary is an organization of business and professional persons, united worldwide, who provide humantarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build good will and peace in the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

We have accomplished our exempt purpose by donations to the following organizations: Salvation Army $1,000; Rotary Foundation $1,500; Wasco Parks and Recreation $2,250; Wasco High School Athletics; $2,900; Wasco Athletic Hall of Fame $2,000; Wasco High School $2,250; Cost to Recovery - Southern California $500; Wasco Family Wrestling $2,000; North Kern Christian School $500; Jim Burke Education Foundation $750; Rotary Rose Parade Float Committee $46; West Kern Aesa $1,300; NAMI Kern County $2,000; Valley Baptist Church $635, etc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.9%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 37.4%; rating input score 37

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -46.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.9% of revenue deployed · 37.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.