Rotary Club of Warren

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340832958
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Warren, OH, USA
Phone
3307274192
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,700
Expenses
$57,787
Assets
$43,745

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY IANNUCCI (PRESIDENT EL)
  • CINDY MATHESON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHERYL OBLINGER (TREASURER)
  • JULIA WETSTEIN (DIRECTOR)
  • ERIC KNOTH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The object of rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise and in particular, to encourage and foster; first, the development of acquaintance as an opportunity for service, second, high ethical standards in business and profession; the recognition of the worthiness of all useful occupations; and the dignifying by each rotarian of his/her occupation as an opportunity to serve society; third, the application of the ideal of service by every rotarian to his/her personal, business, and community life; fourth, the advancement of international understanding, goodwill, and peace through a world fellowship of business and professional men and women united in the ideal of service.

What it reported doing in 2024

Distribution of funds to the rotary club of warren foundation which provides funds for delivery of various services by other non-profit organizations in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 51.1%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 51.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.