Rotary Club of Sandpoint

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820384334
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Sandpoint, ID, USA
Phone
2089183803
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$146,333
Expenses
$128,709
Assets
$162,558
Liabilities
$19,176

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peg Tuddenham (President)
  • Chris Chambers (President-Elect)
  • Emma Keverkamp (President-Past)

People named in this filing

  • Karen Neorr (Treasurer)
  • Matt Kerr (Secretary)
  • Peg Tuddenham (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the Sandpoint Rotary Club is to invoke passion with members who have the spirit of Service Above Self. The members meet weekly for comradery and educational talks about local and regional businesses and other non-profits. Historically the club has accomplished many community projects and collaborated with other Rotary Clubs to complete world projects. Providing support to youth is a key focus of the group. The members of the Club donate time and effort for various fundraiers that flow through the 501(c)3 arm of our organization (Sandpoint Rotary Charitable Trust).

What it reported doing in 2024

Hosting week-end youth Leadership conference for 40 students (Mini RYLA). Additional Club funds were collected for books for elementary school children grades K-2.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 28
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.3%; rating input score 27
  • Program expense ratio: 31%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.3% of revenue deployed · 31% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.