Rotary Club of Peoria

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
370493235
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Peoria, IL, USA
Phone
3096765432
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,547
Expenses
$113,344
Assets
$170,549

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANA STEVENS (Past President)
  • EMILY JACOB-RUDESILL (President)
  • JASON PARKINSON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • GREGORY LARA (Secretary)
  • JANA STEVENS (Past President)
  • CHASE BROWER (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objective of rotary club of peoria is to encourage and foster the idea of service as a basis of worthy enterprise and, in particular, to encourage and foster high ethical business standards to serve the local community and the world beyond, and to advance international understanding, goodwill, and peace. The motto of rotary international is "service above self". The rotary club of peoria has more than 118 member-professionals representing a wide variety of businesses -- both for profit and not-for-profit. Every week, members hear from speakers about the important issues and events of our area. On a regular basis, club members volunteer to help with projects benefiting the peoria area.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Rotary Club of Peoria annually hosts the Sterling Merit Awards Banquet which recognizes the top eight percent scholastically of graduating high school seniors. All area high schools are represented and it recognizes over 186 students annually. The students, parents, and principals are in attendance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 61.9%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 61.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 11 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.