Rotary Club of Naplainville Charitable Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465533772
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
North Attleboro, MA, USA
Phone
5082220002
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,626
Expenses
$18,402
Assets
$44,678

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEVIN MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
  • SEAN CARROLL (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
  • SEAN CARROLL (PRESIDENT EL)
  • IRENE STEELE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rotary club of north attleboro plainville charitable foundation ("the organization") was formed for exclusively charitable and educational purposes. Specifically, the organization is to provde grants to charitable, scientific, literary, educational and religious organizations in support of the charitable activties of the north attleboro plainville rotary club. In addition, the organization will award scholarships to students in schools located in the greater north attleboro/plainville area.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide grants to charitable, scientific, literary, educational and religiious organizations in support of the charitable activities of the north attleboro plainville rotary club. In addition, the organization will award scholarships to students in schools located in the greater north attleboro/plainville area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.43; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.