Rotary Club of Minneapolis City of Lakes

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331562777
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6122266105
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,335
Expenses
$93,179
Assets
$102,864
Liabilities
$21,813

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARIA BAVENDER (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN KIMMES (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • BOB BAKER (VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER)
  • SHAUN IRWIN (PAST PRESIDENT, PPC CHAIR)

People named in this filing

  • MARIA BAVENDER (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN KIMMES (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • BOB BAKER (VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Association of individuals who gather to benefit charitable, benevolent, and educational causes.

What it reported doing in 2025

The rotary club is involved in promoting the welfare of individuals, providing assistance to governmental units in the performance of their functions, and assisting in the development and continuance of international understanding and goodwill. The club sponsors foreign exchange programs. The club also contributes time and other resources to community service programs within minneapolis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.1%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 67.1%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 90.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.1% of revenue deployed · 67.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.