Rotary Club of Macon North Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260301305
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Macon, GA, USA
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,131
Expenses
$57,065
Assets
$40,461

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN HIX (PRESIDENT)
  • TERA EDWARDS (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN COZART (CHAIR)
  • GIGI ROLFES (CHAIR)
  • ANDY GREENWAY (CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community service

What it reported doing in 2024

For fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, our community service efforts were focused on literacy and meal delivery. Our club initiated some of the service projects and partnered with other rotary clubs on joint projects. Our rotarians provided monetary support and/or "sweat equity" for the following: - packing and distribution of meals to families in need for thanksgiving and through back pack ministries at different times throughout the year - supported literacy for a local elementary school by providing books to students - provided a scholarship to a local student via our annual boston butt fundraiser - provided christmas gifts for a local family in need - hosted a 5k race fundraiser with proceeds supporting local charitable organizations - participated in local beautification and clean up efforts - co-hosted an international student via rotary's grsp program

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.