Rotary Club of Lincolnton Nc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 566063138
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Lincolnton, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7045848031
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,840
- Expenses
- $43,701
- Assets
- $47,113
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBIN RADOVICH (Past President)
- CLIFFTON BRUMFIELD (President-Elect)
- C DEAN LUTZ (President Elect)
People named in this filing
- ROBIN RADOVICH (Past President)
- KEITH POSTON (Secretary)
- CLIFFTON BRUMFIELD (President-Elect)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide fellowship and service as outlined in Rotary International's core purpose: Service above self in all local communities and around the World.
What it reported doing in 2024
34th Annual Lincolnton Rotary Apple Festival Road RaceEach year RCL sponsors the AFRR event, a key venue of the Fall Apple Festival sponsored by the City of Lincolnton and Lincoln County. The event is made up of a 5K race and a 1-mile fun walk/run. RCL members man the event staff and safety personnel roles. Registration fees, sponsorships and donations derived from the event fund several RCL community projects each year such as: three team sponsorships for the Lincolnton Optimist Club's sports program, a Lincolnton High School Interact Club scholarship (and possibly a grant to the Interact Club for a school/communityproject dependent on the funds raised each year) aswell as scholarships to Rotary District 7670's Rotary Youth Leadership Academy held each summer for high school rising seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.