Rotary Club of Harlingen
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741368890
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Harlingen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9567938952
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,549
- Expenses
- $80,501
- Assets
- $185,717
- Liabilities
- $37,697
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS BOSWELL (PRESIDENT)
- VICTOR RIVERA (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- BELLE ZAPATA (PRESIDENT NOMINEE)
- JUJU STRINGFIELD (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHRIS BOSWELL (PRESIDENT)
- VICTOR RIVERA (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- BELLE ZAPATA (PRESIDENT NOMINEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide assistance to charitable organizations in our community and to provide college scholarships and other assistance to high school graduates and other youth in our community to help further their education
What it reported doing in 2024
Various rotary programs - provided funds to various rotary programs to encourage youth to become leaders and involved good citizens through the four way speech contest, interact clubs and rotary youth leadership activities (ryla); provided funds to the rotary international foundation; and provided funds to other rotary programs such as the adoption awareness program and the international youth exchange program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.31; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.