Rotary Club of Hanalei Bay Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990322649
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Hanalei, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8083208354
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,821
- Expenses
- $162,951
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mal Dohrman (President)
- Carolyn Lauro (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mal Dohrman (President)
- Mark Wolfendale (Secretary)
- Carolyn Lauro (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To undertake, promote, sponsor, and support programs, activities, events and organizations that benefit the people of the county of kauai and the state of Hawaii.
What it reported doing in 2025
Maintained community resources such as the Rotary Park Rotary Orchard: A lot of maintenance was performed by club volunteers and high school students including putting down weed cloth and borders and graveling the paths. In addition, some of the trees were pruned underneath the power poles and volunteers have periodically weeded and weed-wacked the area. Fruits from the trees have been distributed in food boxes to kpuna through Aina Ho'okupu O Kilauea (where the orchard is located) In the summer of 2025, a peace pole and two benches were installed to add to the inspirational nature of the project
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.1%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 6%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -682.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.1% of revenue deployed · 6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.