Rotary Club of Eureka Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 940461997
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Eureka, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7074411111
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,576
- Expenses
- $32,497
- Assets
- $50,699
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH LINK (PRESIDENT EL)
- THAVISAK LUCKY SYPHANTONG (PRESIDENT 24)
- DALE WARMUTH (PRESIDENT 25)
People named in this filing
- NEAL CARNAM (DIRECTOR)
- NANCY DEAN (SECRETARY)
- KANDIS KELSEY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We provide help & grants for the benefit of other organizations, community groups and individuals. We strive to make a positive, lasting change in our local communities and elsewhere in the world. Our guiding principles are service, fellowship, diversity, integrity and leadership. We believe we have a shared responsibility to take action on our world's most persistent issues. Our 35,000+ clubs work together to promote peace; fight disease; provide clean water, sanitation and hygiene; save mothers and children; support education; and grow local economies. A portion of our charitable activities is achieved through eureka 1923 public benefit corporation, an affiliated 501(c)(3) charitable organization.
What it reported doing in 2024
We provide numerous grants made for the benefit of other charitable organizations and community groups and foreign exchange students. A portion of our charitable activites are achieved through eureka 1923 public benefit corporation, an affiliated 501(c)(3) charitable organization. We provide related education and assist with community awareness efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.